Where Have Girls State Champion Teams Earned Their Points?

Loveland's Blonde Bombers were responsible for a state title or two won on the basis of sprint relays.

Think of this article as a follow-on to my piece a couple days ago about going to the CHSAA Track and Field committee with a proposal to partly redo the way we do relays.

Bobby Tillman (Pueblo West, formerly of Sand Creek) asked in a comment about whether scoring was coming disproportionately from sprint events.

It's difficult to say exactly what disproportionate is with respect to scoring. One person may have a much different idea of what disproportionate means compared to another person. But, what we can do is generate the data and let everyone interested in the question have a look.

So, I gathered the list of girls state champion teams from 2011 (the year we started 1A track and field at the state meet) forward. I found the total number of team points each state champion team earned, and also the number of sprint (100, 200, and 400) points earned and the number of sprint relay (4x100, 4x200, 4x400, SMR8) points earned.

All that resulted in the table you see below:

Team Total Pts Sprint Pts Sprint Relay Pts
HCA 121 11 12
Paonia 139 29 37
Eaton 107.5 9 28
TCA 84.5 19 34
FoCo 81 16 13
HCA 129 32 14
Paonia 132 17 36
Eaton 95.5 4 26
Niwot 85 12 25
CT 99.5 29 25
SMW 74 12 9
Paonia 102 13 38
TCA 111 15 29
Niwot 66 0 26
FoCo 84 8 10
SMW 74 17 13
Paonia 87 12 31
TCA 135 10 25
Niwot 70 0 21
Cherry Creek 86 13 17
Merino 94.5 2 32
Lyons  86.5 1 10
TCA 137 14 29
TV 76 6 15
Loveland 85.33 0 38
Merino 92 4 23
Lyons 116 20 17
Berthoud 89 14 28
Mullen 58 20 20
Loveland 81 5 34

If you're like me, one of your first observations was, "Well, evidently there is more than one road that leads to Rome."

Not every girls state title in recent years has been won on the back of sprinters, not even close.

Three of the last four 1A state titles have had comparatively little to do with sprinters. In 2012, the Lyons 2A title and the Thompson Valley 4A title had very little to do with sprinting. Niwot managed 4A state titles in 2013 and 2014 with no points from individual sprint events, though the Cougars did cobble together a few pretty nice sprint relays those years. Eaton's last two 3A state titles have had sprint contributions, but they were really much more about other events.

On the other hand, you could argue that state titles were locked down by some combination of sprints and sprint relays by Paonia (2013 forward), The Classical Academy (2014, 2016), Loveland (2011, 2012), Cherokee Trail (2015), Loveland (2011, 2012), Merino (2012), Mullen (2011), and Berthoud (2011). Sometimes, these efforts were based heavily on the contributions of a single athlete (think athletes like Courtney Mills,* Shayna Yon, and Christine Scott), but more often not.

And, it's a dangerous question to ask, "How much is too much?" It's a far better policy to begin by salute the efforts of coaches who craft winning teams with the resources available and an eye toward using the resources in the opportunities that present themselves.

That said, if you want to make the case that the harvest of points that can be earned via sprints and sprint relays relative to points that can be earned in other event areas should be trimmed back, these are data that you want to look at. 

For now, at least, I leave the reader to make up his or her own mind on that question. Personally, I need more time to think about what the data above actually tell us with respect to winning state titles.**

* - Courtney Mills was actually not primarily a sprinter but she did sprint and did earn a decisive share of Berthoud's 2011 state meet total.

** - That said, there are vastly more slots for girls sprinters in Colorado high school track meets than for other event disciplines. On that basis alone, I think you can make the case for trimming a sprint relay, but that is not precisely the main question to be answered by looking at the above data.